CrossFit Discussion Board  

Go Back   CrossFit Discussion Board > CrossFit Forum > Fitness
CrossFit Home Forum Site Rules CrossFit FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Fitness Theory and Practice. CrossFit's rationale & foundations. Who is fit? What is fitness?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2009, 09:57 PM   #1
Aaron Ledbetter
Member Aaron Ledbetter is offline
 
Profile:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eugene  OR
Posts: 1
Cool Adaptation

I ran into a really cool article.
http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archiv...ive_basins.php
[Work Safe and all that good jazz]

Note, that the writer is talking about biological fitness, "It describes the capability of an individual of certain genotype to reproduce"... wikipedia

I found many parallels in my understanding of crossfit methodology in adaptation and specialization.

Looking at the first graph, I pictures the landscape of the 10 recognized general physical skills, and the peaks being the efficacy and efficiency the individual was able to master said skills, or more plainly how they have come to adapt in those skill areas. I can also picture the other measures of health/wellness/fitness, like VO2-max, cholesterol, bone density, etc. Obviously, genetic potential would be the limiting factor for maximizing the various peaks. However the overall goal would be to raise the mean height of all the peaks, maximizing overall fitness (as in Crossfit-ness).

From the article:
"In this standard picture, the form of the peaks is created by the environment say, the high peaks of fitness needed to survive in a desert. But of course, in real life, optimal fitness is a moving target, or a moving peak so to speak [...]"

I continued my thought exercise into the second diagram and subsequent relations the article addresses.

This reversal on landscapes could help explain the understanding that crossfit seems to provoke, "more then the some of it's parts", and some of the idea's that the "black box", the vagueness and un-understood, parts that crossfit has.

From the Article:
"Strange attractors create deep wells that suck down entities. Getting out of the well is a struggle. Reversing out of the inverted peak is what takes energy. Reaching the bottom is the key effort." [My emphasis]

The other way I picture this is the ease in which it is to specialize (not necessarily to perfection), and the difficulty it is to adapt into new "wells". A few examples, an individual has specialized into being severely overweight, another individual who has specialized into ultra-marathon running, or even the natural strengths that an individual already expresses. The object of all being the effort and energy it takes to to escape.

From the Article:
"Only a severe hit of energy and outside perturbations can dislodge it from a well and move into another form-basin."


Of course this is an immature and new idea in my mind, so please don't harp on me too bad However, I would live to hear your thoughts on the parallels, or lack there of...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fat adaptation and gene expression Patrick Poblocki Nutrition 2 12-14-2008 11:47 AM
Endurance Adaptation Tom Shetina Fitness 4 11-05-2008 10:56 AM
What adaptation prevents Rhabdo? Andrew Gray Fitness 8 05-27-2008 07:43 AM
Crossfit/training adaptation in kids Emil Berengut Fitness 3 12-01-2006 02:35 PM
Heat adaptation James Falkner Exercises 3 08-05-2005 09:17 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CrossFit is a registered trademark of CrossFit Inc.